[Scoped] Akira (1988) [BD x264, JPN FLAC, ENG ASS] :: Nyaa ISS

[Scoped] Akira (1988) [BD x264, JPN FLAC, ENG ASS]

Category:
Date:
2021-07-06 11:54 UTC
Submitter:
Seeders:
5
Information:
Leechers:
1
File size:
50.1 GiB
Completed:
156
Info hash:
2a27f53672cca0031f1016d04b0b7c1213bee19d
*** update: 10/10/20201 - there will be a v2 uploaded at some point in the future with a new script once LD audio is captured. *** Sources: Video: ITBD [hydes] Japanese: 2.0 Original - JPBD [WPR] 5.1 Hypersonic - UKBD [Kaze] 5.1 Classic - ITBD [hydes] Subtitles: USBD [brap] [mediainfo](https://pastebin.com/5cmeC1Wk) *** **Video Modifications:** [Cropped](https://slow.pics/c/siQFsx1W). [Rescaled](https://slow.pics/c/2czgEhC4). [Stabilised](https://slow.pics/c/xhlk4TBV) [Dehaloed](https://slow.pics/c/8LkxrExt). [Sharpened](https://slow.pics/c/svwS6SCv). [Grained](https://slow.pics/c/BSixCWuE). **Audio Modifications:** Japanese 2.0 Original - LPCM 2.0 (48kHz, 16-bit) converted to FLAC. Japanese 5.1 Hypersonic - Dolby TrueHD 5.1 (192kHz, 24-bit) converted to FLAC 5.1 (96kHz, 16-bit). Japanese 5.1 Classic - DTS-HD MA 5.1 (48kHz, 24-bit) converted to FLAC (48kHz, 16-bit). **Subtitle Modifications:** OCRed and font-changed (font changed by me). Reinstated honorifics (Tetsuo-kun for instance) Reverted to Japanese name order (Shima Tetsuo instead of Tetsuo Shima) Used some lines from THORA's subtitles for lines Funimation didn't translate. De-Boomered the translation when required. Retimed every line. *** **Why This Exists:** All the BDs for Akira look a bit shit, the Dynit one is considered the best but it leaves a lot to be desired with it being based around a 2001 DVD master. I decided with this filtering to approach it from an enhancement perspective, instead of just fixing the [haloing](https://i.slow.pics/WVCqQuZx.png) present and calling it a day. *** **Filtering Details:** The restoration this BD is based on a 2001 restoration, and was a [4:3](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/481891099711897602/861394413422510100/unknown.png), [1080i](https://youtu.be/i_lIoXoBMDs?t=124) restoration which was cropped to the intended AR resulting in it being 774p, which means it is upscaled for any BD. Rescaling to this res manages to sharpen the image and [bring out details](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/481891099711897602/861389624257150986/2DyfA9IRI9.mp4) that weren't obvious before. Video has been stabilised to counteract gate-weave due to inherent characteristics of film scanning. Only 4 pixels horizontally and vertically has been lost. This source has a rather ludicrous amount of haloing, dehaloing was applied to make a nicer image. Next a sharpening filter was applied as the source is rather blurry. Sharpening the video achieves a remaster look that makes it visually pretty astonishing. During the original restoration degraining was applied as well as the grain in general being rather ugly. A grain filter has been applied to give it a more uniform look as well as further giving it a remaster look. [5 Comparison Shots](https://slow.pics/c/lNHqSUqX) *** **A brief history of Akira in the Digital Era written by WPR:** Akira has been one of the most re-released anime films of all time, with several editions, and tons of audio mixes in both its original Japanese and often many languages receiving multiple dubs. Released theatrically in Japan in 1988, it wasn’t the animation masterpiece we know today. Around 200 visual fixes were produced for the Japanese Laserdisc released later that year, and the audio was fully remixed. Among said changes were the end credits: originally in Japanese, they were completely remade from scratch, fully spelled out in English. This updated Laserdisc release is what we know and love, and was overseen by director Katsuhiro Otomo. The theatrical version has never been released on home video... ever. Despite the numerous releases, however, in the digital age, Akira has only been restored twice: once by IVC in Chicago using a newly made interpositive struck from the original camera negative by Bandai in Japan. The IP was scanned on a Spirit Datacine, and was restored using both automated and manual cleanup. The film restoration and simultaneously produced new English dub were examined and approved by THX... and secondly by Q-Tec in Japan, also using a newly made interpositive struck from the original camera negative, scanned at 16-bit HDR from a Lasergraphics 6.5K scanner, and restored through Q-Tec’s own FORS Master Process. It’s a tale of two restorations: one, a respectable, but dated remaster with pure intentions to deliver the definitive presentation possible in said era, let down mostly by technological restraints... and the other, a disastrous restoration utilizing a superb scan (still of an IP, because Bandai are too scared to use the neg), only to be mutilated by destructive filtering to the filmic integrity of the source, resulting in a less detailed and refined presentation, with only a solid HDR pass as its saving grace. As such, the 2001 restoration by IVC and THX is still the best source of the film to date, with the most recent Italian Blu-ray by esteemed distributor Dynit as the best encoded version of it on disc. Bandai Visual claimed their 2009 Blu-ray featured a brand new restoration, however, when compared to the 2001 DVD restoration by IVC, it appears the general qualities are very similar, if not nearly identical. With regards to audio in Japanese, said original audio mix has never been released, and as such, the Laserdisc Dolby Surround track should be considered the “original” standard mix. Alongside the 2001 restoration, a new Japanese 5.1 remix was produced, staying mostly faithful to the sound design and mixing of the ‘88 LD track. However, fundamental changes begin here which persist in every subsequent remix. In 2009, when Bandai Visual released Akira on Blu-ray for the first time, one of the major selling points was a brand new remix utilizing the full bandwidth of the Dolby TrueHD codec: lossless 5.1 surround at 192kHz at full 24-bit. Simply put, the 2009 Hypersonic mix is an absolute beast of a track, featuring absolute reference quality clarity and fidelity, resulting in one of the best sounding audio tracks to any film ever made... on a technical level. With regards to the mixing, while frequently stunning, it is far removed from the ‘88 LD track, with many changes both logical and illogical, producing a track both highly respected and criticized for its revisionist nature. Still, it deserves to be heard by any and all audiophiles with the caveat regarding faithfulness to the source material. And lastly, for its 4K UHD Blu-ray release, a second Hypersonic track was performed, with a number of changes from its 2009 cousin, but with very few positives. Major noise reduction has been applied to the mix, resulting in less clear dialogue and distorted effects, but the mixing has even more questionable changes. Sound effects have been boosted to compensate for the severe NR, and audio levels are nowhere near as refined as the 2009 track, where an intricate balance of intensely crafted action and quieter, yet immersive sound mixing has been traded for a sonic whiplash of brash and distorted action with moments so filtered it’s hard to even hear the tiny background effects in less intense moments. Due to such sonic stupidity, the 4K hypersonic track has not been included. As such, my personal suggestion is to watch the film with the 2.0 Dolby Surround track, as it is a faithful representation of how the film was intended to be heard on home video. If you demand discreet and not matrixed surround sound, the 2001 5.1 mix is a decent alternative. Finally, the 2009 hypersonic mix is a must listen, but as an alternative track due to its many changes in the core design and elements at play. *** **A brief message from a fan-favourite character:** Had to retime every line because Funi didn't get the memo that you're supposed to time the subtitles to the dialog. They also thought it was a great fucking idea to translate a bunch of irrelevant signs but not bother with the dialog. I mean if you bought a Funimation release in the first place then you probably can't glance at a sign and read dialog at the same time though. Guess they know their audience. Wait? What's that? A line of dialog appearing on screen for a tenth of a second right after a sign that was sitting on screen for almost 12 seconds? Great job Funi! We all had time to read that. Thank you THORA for being the only release group in existence to my knowledge that actually translated the missing lines. *** ![](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/585561145025364108/861792089556516864/Akira_art.png)

File list

  • [Scoped] Akira (1988) [BD x264, JPN FLAC, ENG ASS].mkv (50.1 GiB)
Great work! Looking forward to watching it. >Bandai Visual claimed their 2009 Blu-ray featured a brand new restoration, however, when compared to the 2001 DVD restoration by IVC, it appears the general qualities are very similar, if not nearly identical. Ah, so that was the thing WPR was going to show me. After checking the Manga DVD on caps-a-holic, I can see the resemblance.
> De-Boomered the translation when required. Huh?
> 1080p > 52.4 Mb/s Is this a joke?

Scoped (uploader)

User
@Mabby ![](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/861971223412342794/861971238238814228/unknown.png) No. The high bitrate retains optimum quality. If it is a problem perhaps this is more up your alley - https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1284282.
You shouldn't need this much bitrate for a transparent encode. Even live action movies don't need this much, and anime is so much more compressible.

Scoped (uploader)

User
@Godim This bitrate was required for a transparent encode due to the nature of the filtering described above.
> and anime is so much more compressible. This has added grain, which is not more compressible. Anime and cartoons have the reputation of being "more compressible" because they are flat and generally lack high frequency noise. That's the opposite of this release. Also, many live action discs at bitrates of 35 Mbps (close to maximum for Blu-ray) still have plenty of blocking if you know where to look. If you want a release with more compromises, this film came out in 1990, so there's a couple of smaller releases available already.
Why did you @ me with bitrate information? I was inquiring about subtitle changes.

Scoped (uploader)

User
@Mabby It was a miss-tag.
this looked promising until i read about sharpening and degraining... I'll pass.
Alright, well any update on what you actually changed TL-wise? What do you consider boomer translation? I see some signs have translation now too (from funi base used) but if you were going through such effort, I would have maybe tried to TS them to look better. As you put it, "probably can’t glance at a sign and read dialog at the same time", so no point in leaving it in as a floating top line without TS.
epic meme release
10/10 bloat, would ignore again
Interesting, good job!
Imagine complaining about the only release that bothers to fix the visuals and includes all the Japanese audio because you cant afford a hard drive.
Nyaatards back at it again instantly trash talking people's releases without even watching them LOL
I approve this release. Imagine complaining about a high quality Akira release with the methodology clearly described in the description.
Thank you again for this encode of a classic movie, will be my first time watching it. Much appreciated
>all dbztards pottery ![](https://files.catbox.moe/vecwc9.png)
Good thing I only like the manga, which doesn't have a Z
@Mabby Lol Scoped came up with the term. Basically I just took any cringe dialog that sounded like it was from a 1950s movie and made it sound more natural. There was only a couple of times I did it and it's still accurate to the Japanese.
As always, people bitching about not being able to afford hard drives.... sheesh. Also, finally the perfect way of watching this film.

LCE

User
> a 4:3, 1080i restoration which was cropped to the intended AR resulting in it being 774p So what did you use to rescale
Bigger than BD and yet it looks worse than it but whatever fits ya needs, ill just keep by d-z0n3 encode that seems more superior to this thing.
Thank you this looks great! @absinth I too loved when it looked blurry! Looks too sharp now! Too big for my 50gb hard drive I've had since 2001!
yikes... how can a lossless'er (I guess) be larger than the actual bdmv? qcomp @ 0.85 (thought the limit is 0.80) that's probably one of the factors on why it's so bloated and also the sharpening depending on when it was done as it could of been applied after adding grain and not before therefore sharpening the grain too. I dunno if you used a filter or just the h264 parameter or both to sharpen. Was AA used after? Did you consider hevc? or were you going for compatibility? h264 8 bit with crf 18 ok. Not a fan of Stabilisation since you cut pixels off the video. Why not go all the way to 16 ref? What benefit does going rc_lookahead 250 do besides placebo? I think going hevc would of been better since you were going with exceeding recommended maximum parameters and trying to retain all the detail and grain. If you wanna go that high it'll be better suited in hevc.
Thanks for this! Time for a rewatch :)
@warui Congratulations, you know nothing about encode and you didn't even bother to read the description because you're making questions answered in the description.

LCE

User
Why are all dragontards like this

Scoped (uploader)

User
@warui >be larger than the actual bdmv The source is being enhanced upon and is having detail added to it, do you expect it to be smaller than source? >qcomp @ 0.85 (thought the limit is 0.80) Qcomp allows values of 0.0-1.0, if there were a limit at 0.8 I would not of been able to use 0.85. I used this value to retain detail. >not before therefore sharpening the grain too Did you read the description? >I dunno if you used a filter Did you read the description? >Did you consider hevc? When was grain + H265 was ever considered a good idea? >Why not go all the way to 16 ref? Ref 16 increases encode time for minuscule reductions in file-size. >What benefit does going rc_lookahead 250 do besides placebo? Theres no reason not to do it when all it does is use more RAM which was further assisted by MB-Tree. If ref 16 was like rc-lookahead and didn't slow down the encode time significantly I would of also used it. >retain all the detail and grain That's the point of a high quality release.

Scoped (uploader)

User
@scav, @PeePeePooPoo69, @Venny, @iKaos, @Ghosty6464, @Krycek7o2, @Gei17, @hydes Thank you for the positive comments about the release.
![alt text](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/676245303799578654/862252774367428628/NyaaBrainSquad.png)

Scoped (uploader)

User
@DonCanjas Thank you as well. I forgot to include your name in the previous comment.
![](https://imgur.com/Fn4RrVk.png)
Perfect for a first-time watch. Nice work!
[@Gei14][1] nice edit man [1]:https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1406204#com-34
>Video Modifications: >Rescaled. >Stabilised >Sharpened. >Grained. >Reinstated honorifics (Tetsuo-kun for instance) >De-Boomered the translation when required. >All the BDs for Akira look a bit shit, the Dynit one is considered the best but it leaves a lot to be desired with it being based around a 2001 DVD master. >I decided with this filtering to approach it from an enhancement perspective >The restoration this BD is based on a 2001 restoration, and was a 4:3, 1080i restoration which was cropped to the intended AR resulting in it being 774p, which means it is upscaled for any BD. Rescaling to this res manages to sharpen the image and bring out details that weren’t obvious before >Video has been stabilised to counteract gate-weave due to inherent characteristics of film scanning. Only 4 pixels horizontally and vertically has been lost. >Next a sharpening filter was applied as the source is rather blurry. Sharpening the video achieves a remaster look that makes it visually pretty astonishing. >During the original restoration degraining was applied as well as the grain in general being rather ugly. A grain filter has been applied to give it a more uniform look as well as further giving it a remaster look. >No. The high bitrate retains optimum quality. If it is a problem perhaps this is more up your alley >This bitrate was required for a transparent encode due to the nature of the filtering described above. >This has added grain, which is not more compressible. Anime and cartoons have the reputation of being “more compressible” because they are flat and generally lack high frequency noise. That’s the opposite of this release. Also, many live action discs at bitrates of 35 Mbps (close to maximum for Blu-ray) still have plenty of blocking if you know where to look. If you want a release with more compromises, this film came out in 1990, so there’s a couple of smaller releases available already.
>Imagine complaining about the only release that bothers to fix the visuals and includes all the Japanese audio because you cant afford a hard drive. >Nyaatards back at it again instantly trash talking people’s releases without even watching them LOL >I approve this release. Imagine complaining about a high quality Akira release with the methodology clearly described in the description. >Lol Scoped came up with the term. Basically I just took any cringe dialog that sounded like it was from a 1950s movie and made it sound more natural. There was only a couple of times I did it and it’s still accurate to the Japanese. >As always, people bitching about not being able to afford hard drives… sheesh. Also, finally the perfect way of watching this film. >The source is being enhanced upon and is having detail added to it, do you expect it to be smaller than source? >That’s the point of a high quality release. >https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/676245303799578654/862252774367428628/NyaaBrainSquad.png ![](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771790177025916964/861997370699022376/9b6b2f69046bdb8d52cd3891c3331b96.png)
And Nyaa calls the Dragon Ball fandom toxic? Alright anime girl pfps you do you
Don't bully the cute anime girls 😔
fortnite free vbucks
@Scoped >The source is being enhanced upon and is having detail added to it, do you expect it to be smaller than source? I think the majority would believe an encode of the source even if enhanced should be smaller especially from a gen 3 encode? (master > encode to BDMV > this). >Qcomp allows values of 0.0-1.0, if there were a limit at 0.8 I would not of been able to use 0.85. I used this value to retain detail. My bad I thought the limit is 0.80 qcomp. Wouldn't it had been better to just go with 0% qcomp for constant? >Did you read the description? x2 Yeah I did read it. I messed up my sentence, sorry. It should be read as "I dunno if you just used filter or with both h264 parameter to sharpen. Was AA used after?" Also, I mistakenly thought in the parameter used the sharpening in psy_rd but it was aq 3. So ignore this question as I saw the sample images provided and in some it could of used AA to soften the sharp line art that was introduced a bit. >When was grain + H265 was ever considered a good idea? Since 3.1. There's animation tune as well. I'll take it you haven't touched hevc in a long time or ever. >Ref 16 increases encode time for minuscule reductions in file-size. Not only reduction but your goal was enhacement? And this would of helped even a bit for better visual quality and more efficient compression. >Theres no reason not to do it when all it does is use more RAM which was further assisted by MB-Tree. If ref 16 was like rc-lookahead and didn’t slow down the encode time significantly I would of also used it. Why care about encode time if the purpose is for the highest quality enhacement available both filter and parameter? Also ref 16 would of also increased RAM by a small bit too.
@DonCanjas I actually did read it moron. You didn't specify on how I don't know how to encode. You would only be right when it comes to chroma debanding as I'm still trying to understand this & how to do it. But check this, did you read my comment properly as you've been accusing me since I'm apparently making up questions that are in the description such as if AA was used & certain other questions. @Gei17 I'm not shitting on this release freak with the creepy art. I'm asking questions as the intentions are a bit confusing.

LCE

User
Tfw never answered my question

Scoped (uploader)

User
@warui The majority when it comes to encoding believe file-size is a priority instead of quality of video. No, going with 0.0 Qcomp is beyond stupid especially on an encode where different sections of the screen have different levels detail. AA would destroy line details to high heaven and back, this is a cel-animated movie and the lines have an abundance of texture that AA would scrub away. The sharpening just makes it more apparent. Animation tune only works for truly flat video, this is grainy and visually complex. Tune grain is the best for this particular encode and in general tune animation is pointless. Yes, it would have helped but the cost to encode time was pointless. I have things I want to do with my PC other than encode you know and the file-size I ended up with was small enough. I don't see the point in answering this last one, ref 16 and rc_lookahead 250 aren't comparable.

Scoped (uploader)

User
@LCE I don't get paid to tell people on Nyaa what I used to filter video. There is a QnA server linked where I answer questions tho. ![](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/861971223412342794/862391518882299994/unknown.png)
New wallpaper for the forseeable future; the best part is that Scoped's pfp fits right in with no modification whatsoever ![](https://files.catbox.moe/iulhsb.jpg) Personally I think that video and dialogue quality should be as faithful as possible to the original artists' intentions; this release tarnishes both by attempting to make Akira seem new through sharpening the video and 'de-boomerizing' the dialogue. I sincerely hope you didn't add sus anywhere in the script. Bringing people from SoM to back you up is a bad look too; I'd find a more reputable group to hitch your wagon to
Yeesh this is another bad look man ![](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771790177025916964/862412465866014740/unknown.png)
You know that it's a good release when the comment section is just shitpost. You don't see this kind of stuff in Moozzi2's posts
@Don that's a logical fallacy actually; it's called denying the antecedent. I'll humor you though with [some shitposty moozzi](https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1062374)
@Arcus_Deer Dragon Ball anime has always shitpost, doesn't count
> You don’t see this kind of stuff in Moozzi2’s posts [What are you smoking?](https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1113965) also tfw the encoder can't explain why his encode isn't bad and has to get his discord buddies to back him up ![lmao!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/699418508672499746.png?v=1)
You got me, I never thought anyone would open moozzi2's posts

Scoped (uploader)

User
@Arcus_Deer 1. The original intent of the artists was removed once already by the makers themselves. We're already dealing with revisionist material, old and dated revisionist material. 2. The video was already handled poorly in the first place, my attempts of enhancement are more true to how the original camera negative would be than the raw video itself. Was haloing intended? Was blurred out line texture intended? Degraining to remove the compressed grain is a fools errand yet I see no complaints about de-graining to match the original cels. If you view cel scan of Akira it looks nothing like the ITBD. 3. Fixing flaws in a old restoration of an old stock of film doesn't go against original intent and trying to paint it as such is disingenuous and wrong. By fixing the flaws of the original I am *restoring* more of the original intent. This isn't a Moozzi2 release. 4. The "de-boomerised" dialogue as listed above wasn't done by me, hence why [Scoped] isn't listed next to the subtitles. However the changes honour the original Japanese, a re-translation of a line doesn't go against the original intent either. The changes to dialogue can be viewed [here](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/861971223412342794/862418171869003786/unknown.png), no "Jack" isn't said in the dialogue.
All this fighting over a frickin boomer movie... don't y'all have heart medication to take instead?
@warui > I dunno if you used a filter or just the h264 parameter or both to sharpen. Was AA used after? ![](https://imgur.com/cR1JQf2.png) If you're only learning about encoding, then I apologize. Too many people like to brag about stupid stuff and I thought you were one of them
This actually looks really good, good job Scoped!
@DonCanjas I'm not "learning" (as in a total newbie) on how to encode dude. I've already addressed that sentence mistake in my reply to scooped. @scooped. >The majority when it comes to encoding believe file-size is a priority instead of quality of video. You must be referring to just the leeches who say such things which I would agree but I was talking about more on the consensus that the file size should be drastically smaller. >AA would destroy line details to high heaven and back, this is a cel-animated movie and the lines have an abundance of texture that AA would scrub away. The sharpening just makes it more apparent. That would depend on what AA filter was used and where in the chain as well. Is it before downscaling? or is it after upsampling? And so forth. ___ I don't really see any shitposts here and folks like DonCanjas just blanketing the term onto whatever they deem so, anyways what I do see is criticizing the file size since this is a gen 3 encode with severe grain. It's to be expected that the file size would normally be much smaller and definitely not surpassing the bdmv itself. I might be mistaken but I don't see a cel artwork in the description to "match" what was done on this encode. I would say this video would be good for re-encoders to use.
Holy shit for a second I thought I was reading a thread on /a/, but no this is a Nyaa comment section.
@venny why would you insult 4chan by comparing it to nyaa
@PeePeePooPoo69 Yeah your right people on 4chan probably have less brain damage kek
I made it into a nyaa's meme, this feels like some kind of life goal but for losers. Still happy tho.
@Ingenioussubs Your shitty HEVC encodes? Agreed.
@jillvalentine You mean the hevc encodes Ingenioussubs uses from time to time from sources like VCB-Studio? Their shitty? Or do you think encoding in hevc in general is shitty? Whatever the case is your comment is stupid.
@warui VCB-Studio went to shit. So did SOFCJ. Beatrice was never good. Fuck your shitty meme releases and your worthless comments. You people will say anything to justify having smaller encodes because you can't afford more hard drives.
omg, this is so cringe. The cynical thought that an Internet user can do a better job than professionals will never go away.
One of the shittiest comment section on nyaa!
@fernandocatana Well the fact is internet users are becoming professionals... What Scoped released here with Akira is better than any "Professional" at FUNimation could ever wish to achieve
@jillvalentine VCB-Studio went to shit? meme releases? Whatever the hell that even means. You people? Yikes. I'm dealing with a low intellectual being I see. Perhaps you feelin dissed as only double digits will be reading your de-boomered edits on the script. Also, can you provide your encodes than I think it's a good deduction that a file size would be much smaller for a 3rd generation encode. Not see one that exponentially exceeds the file size of the closest thing to a lossless source, the bdmv itself and state that it's better with sharpened edges to the line art with no AA and excessive grain and questionable parameters all in all supposedly should match the cel artwork that remains elusive of any sample images.
![](https://files.catbox.moe/ed4erg.gif)
@warui didnt read lmao ![alt text](https://i.imgur.com/Zz5QESq.jpg)
Looks like I decided to come back and comment at an interesting time... Anyways I was wondering if you have the original untouched 192kHz TrueHD and DTS-HDMA files that I could download and check out to test. Something else I was also kinda wondering if anyone knows if there's any benefit in the other tracks from the 25th Anniversary Funimation BD, like the legacy 2ch audio track, since they're in 96kHz instead of the 48kHz standard unless they're just upsampled for some reason which would be kinda dumb if it is. Otherwise if its an original 96kHz from an analog master, that would be pretty cool.

WPR

User
@DamianV8501 Hi. The FUNimation 25th Anniversary Blu-ray does not actually have the "original" Japanese 2.0 Dolby Surround track at all, because FUNi don't care to include the original audio mix if a remix has been produced. They only have the 2009 Hypersonic track as the sole Japanese option. But, as for the two dubs on there, you are correct that they are encoded at 96kHz, however, they are indeed upsampled from 48kHz, perhaps to appear "cooler" and more on-par "on paper" to the Japanese Hypersonic track. As they are upsampled, they probably aren't the best versions of said dubs. For the 2001 Animaze dub, either the 2009 Bandai BD or 4K BD are better, as they also present the dub in TrueHD 5.1, but at the correct frequency of 48kHz. As for the older dub, user @scav created a fixed version of it utilizing segments from the Criterion Collection Laserdisc and is the best quality version of the "Ninja Turtles" dub. But yeah, thanks for posting, but unfortunately said tracks aren't of use. As for the untouched TrueHD and DTS-HD MA tracks... well, they're easy to obtain. The 2009 Hypersonic track in Dolby TrueHD 5.1 (192kHz, 24-bit) can be found with a remux of the 2009 BD that kept the audio untouched. For reference, the 2009 BD has 100% identical timings to the IT BD Scoped used for this project. In addition, to hear the 2001 Japanese 5.1 remix in DTS-HD MA 5.1 (48kHz, 24-bit), look for a remux of the 2018 Italian Dynit release with untouched audio, as it was on there, and was the source of the video used to create this restoration. Hope this helps!
isnt the bigger the file the better the detail?
I came for the big dick 50 gig Akira file and stayed for the comments. What a day. It's fantastic work by the way.
Nice Good Job Bro! I Love Your Release!!!
I'm so glad that Akira is a big enough movie that decades later, nerds will argue about the fine tuning of a torrent in a comment section for weeks on end.
Noice ....also very entertaining comment section, even if I barely understand half the shit that es said
Holy shit. This encode rocks. We need more high quality releases like this one. You're a saviour
Thank you so much for this. I also really wanna see this 4:3 version of AKIRA if it is open matte, and this was the version on the second disc of the UK DVD. The Criterion LaserDisc and the Streamline subbed VHS were still cropped to 16:9. I am guessing it is in 1.50:1 because the film was alleged to be shot in 65mm even though it was presented in 1.85:1. VistaVision has a negative area of 1.50:1 and is as tall as 70mm film but is technically 35mm so AKIRA must have been shot in VistaVision, since VistaVIsion caught on more in Japan than the West. A 35mm scan of the trailer is in a 1.50:1 aspect ratio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3O27QswOfk
ok but what was used to rescale this, and why not leave it at the native resolution

Scoped (uploader)

User
I rescaled because the output looked better once rescaled. And the "native" res isn't native for reasons stated in the description.
i'm asking why you upscaled it back again to 1080 when you could keep it at 774 for playback in resolutions above 1080, this means extra processing which could result in blurrier final image, especially when it's doubled or quadrupled and then downscaled

Scoped (uploader)

User
The chroma is 540p and crushing it to 387p or upscaling to 774p wasn't worth it, imho. The filtering done *after* the rescaling benefited better from the higher resolution. I tested extensively keeping it at native or resizing back to 1080p and resizing then to a higher resolution; there was absolutely 0 note-worthy difference.
Some ppl claiming saying AA gonna destroy the quality of lines no is not ( also there are many types of AA's there that suited for every scenes ) also other factors must taking care is the correct order of filtering process if missed that sure may result unwated bdw thnx for this release @Scoped